Read this claim and evidence from the passage. claim: antibiotics can lead to the formation of superbugs. evidence: it was difficult for eli's parent to administer antibiotics to him. which statement best evaluates the relevancy and sufficiency of the evidence to this claim? the evidence is both relevant and sufficient. the evidence is relevant but not sufficient. the evidence is sufficient but not relevant. the evidence is neither relevant nor sufficient. need quick i cant figure this out and its due in 20 minutes

I think that the correct answer is "the evidence in neither relevant nor sufficient".

The answer is: The evidence is neither relevant nor sufficient.

In this example the evidence provided “It was difficult for Eli's parent to administer antibiotics to him.” Is not relevant due to does not support any part of the claim “Antibiotics can lead to the formation of superbugs.” And as the evidence does not support the claim neither is sufficient.

specific audience will understand the main ideas. for example, if you were writing an instruction manual for rocket scientists, it would likely look very different from one you would write for young children. your language, tone, and writing style would change significantly.

123 are right hope ths