In lesson 3, you read "after twenty years," also by o. henry. take a few minutes to review the story and then answer the question that follows. when you answer the question, be sure to answer it in the following format (ape): a: answer the question directly p: prove your answer with a quote from each passage e: explain how the proof (quotes) support your answer using the acts of the policeman as your evidence, how are the themes different in the stories?

The themes are different because on the one hand we have friendship and loyalty and on the other guilt..."Twenty years ago we agreed to meet here tonight.It sounds strange.."The officer heard the man.He knew it was his friend.The word strange has many meanings.It is nost usual to have such a long time separation from a true friend.It is not an everyday thing to be in front of a dear friend who is so different physicaly as well as in personality.He remembered that conversation they had about meeting again.He saw his friend was wealthy, had expensive jewelry on him but he was a criminal.He had a conversation with him though."A long time between meetings..Have you heard from your friend..?The cop remained in his place guarding the peace.He was aware of the fact that Bob was a criminal , but he could not do his job, he was still a friend to the person who twenty years ago had made a promise to meet again.And that person was not a criminal.Considering that , he felt guilty of doing his job and could not arrest him.

warren buffett- the oracle of omaha warren buffett came from a normal type of family in nebraska. when hew as young, he understood the value of investing money and gaining interest on that investment. he strived hard at several jobs, but what made him one of the wealthiest men in the world was his gift for allocating capital within a free market system. warren buffett is an example of a man whose wealth is owed largely to the free enterprise system. buffett was able to allocate his money however he wanted, investing in businesses that he thought could compete effectively. without the free market system, he would not have the right to invest however he wanted, and would not have become so wealthy.