subject
English, 24.06.2019 14:30 Paigex3

(quick i need ) read the paragraphs from president jimmy carter’s speech “energy and the national goals—a crisis of confidence.” we are at a turning point in our history. there are two paths to choose. one is a path i’ve warned about tonight, the path that leads to fragmentation and self-interest. down that road lies a mistaken idea of freedom, the right to grasp for ourselves some advantage over others. that path would be one of constant conflict between narrow interests ending in chaos and immobility. it is a certain route to failure. all the traditions of our past, all the lessons of our heritage, all the promises of our future point to another path—the path of common purpose and the restoration of american values. that path leads to true freedom for our nation and ourselves. we can take the first steps down that path as we begin to solve our energy problem. president carter uses pathos to persuade his audience as he attempts to create a sense of fear. which option most accurately explains why this use of pathos might detract from his argument? some audience members will feel judged by his comments and might feel discredited. some audience members may feel that he is being too accepting of intolerable behavior. some audience members may feel forced to follow his suggestions and will be bitter. some audience members may feel that he is oversimplifying the issue and is making assumptions.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 20:10
Why does rosaline represent a foil to juliet ?
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:20
What is the moral cf this fable? a. you should play now and worry about provisions later. you should work hard now so someone will you later. you should work hard and save now so you will have something to show for later. you should play hard and work hard now, so you will enjoy life and still have provisions. select the best answer from the choices provided
Answers: 2
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:00
According to the study what did john steinbeck do to prepare for his book the grapes of wrath
Answers: 3
You know the right answer?
(quick i need ) read the paragraphs from president jimmy carter’s speech “energy and the national go...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722360