Part a: which of the following best identifies the author’s main claim in the text? a. schools can use written materials about television to explore its place in today’s culture and to teach reading, writing, and thinking skills. b. even though watching television provides students with the same advantages as reading literature, it should not be considered as a legitimate school subject. c. english curriculums should incorporate watching television because it benefits students more than reading pop novels and literature. d. watching television does not meet the requirements that determine if something is literature, but it’s likely to develop more comprehensively in the future.

A. Schools can use written materials about television to explore its place in today’s culture and to teach reading, writing, and thinking skills.

Explanation:

This is the option that best identifies the author's main claim in the text. The purpose of the text is to explore whether television can be used in English classes to develop the same skills that literature develops. The conclusion that the author reaches is that, although television is a very different source of information, written materials about it can still be used in the classroom to develop reading, teaching and thinking skills.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.