In the following dialogue, which discussion technique does daniel most clearly show? daniel: did you guys feel the article was biased? kim sato is a newscaster from japan. since newscasters get money and fame when they deliver a big story, i think that it's possible that kim just wants to stir up some controversy. a.challenging established ideasb. synthesizing theses into a single conclusionc. asking clarifying questionsd. evaluating a speaker's point of view

The discussion technique that Daniel most clearly shows in this dialogue is (A.) challenging established ideas.

Daniel's use of this technique is a result of his critical reading of the article. Reading critically not only involves getting a basic grasp of the text but it also involves analyzing, evaluating and questioning the information that is being presented. Daniel is not a 'passive reader'. He has read the text in a deep way, which has allowed him to identify the presence of biased information and build his viewpoint about the topic. The dialogue shows that he does not accept the information presented in a passive way: he questions and challenges established ideas instead.

the narrator is a first person, participant one, who describes in the simple past tense important and difficult events in his earlier life. he also provides temporal markers as the month (january) and the time (12: 30 pm). finally the account of his experience is very detailed, to the extent that a participant narrator would talk the same way about his experiences. a good example of such detail is the mention of the “bovril ration” which historically was a native american food adopted by european explorers in arctic and antarctic regions due to its high level of calories.

for me this my answer o fortunately, they did not notice, and i could pretend not to care.​   i hope this you