Which statement accurately compares the diction in andrew jackson's "on indian removal" to that in michael rutledge's "samuel's memory"? a. jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas rutledge relies on short, direct sentences. b. jackson uses feelings to persuade the audience, whereas rutledge uses logical reasoning. c. jackson's writing is difficult to fully believe, whereas rutledge's writing is much more honest. d. jackson is emotionally detached, whereas rutledge comes across as deeply emotional

The correct answer is A. Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.

The difference between Andrew Jackson’s address to the Congress and Michael Rutledge’s “Samuel’s Memory” is clearly writing techniques and the use of language. Jackson’s sentences are long and very often not really to the point, which makes him sound very intelligent and believable. On the other hand, Rutledge uses short and simple sentences that are straight to the point.

Jackson relies on long, flowing sentences, whereas Rutledge relies on short, direct sentences.

Explanation: ape-x

all of the statements cuz

where is the poem at?