Suppose two students having a discussion about a book get into an argument about the motives of the main character. what is the best way for the students to get the discussion back on track? a. discuss a book that is less controversial for the students. b.ask the teacher to settle the argument. c.repeat each other's main point until both students agree on one of them. d.restate the main topic and try to find common ground.

D. Restate the main topic and try to find common ground.

Explanation:

This is probably the best strategy for the students to get the discussion back on track. The students seem to be confused as to the motives of the main character. They disagree, and they are struggling to move on. One of the strategies that could be useful to them would be to restate the main topic, and try to find common ground in this subject. This will refocus their attention to something that is less controversial.

to kill a mockingbird basically is about a lawyer who goes against everything in a racist society like at the time of this novel, to defend a black man accused of sexual abuse. in the bible there are cases like that of joseph, who was accused by the woman of potifar, for a crime similar to that of tim robbinson, of that novel (genesis 39: 1-20). at this point we see that god also provides the escape to joseph, who was accused unjustly, but in his time, and through his attitude, his faith was not shaken, and god provided the solution. the perspective of god also written in the bible and not pay evil with evil. (ephesians 4: 32, 1 thessalonians 5: 15, 1 peter 3: 9). atticus, the lawyer, demonstrated during this lee novel, empathy, love of neighbor, understood the situation of this accused man. he went against everything in that society, and stood in favor of that man, for the injustice committed. this shows the empathy, the love taught by christ, in some passages that speak of love and justice in the sermon of the beatitudes (especially verses 6 and 7 of matthew 5).