English, 31.12.2019 07:31 smariedegray

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney. the question before us is, whether the class of persons described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of this people, and are constituent members of this sovereignty? we think they are not, and that they are not included, and were not intended to be included, under the word "citizens" in the constitution, and can therefore claim none of the rights and privileges which that instrument provides for and secures to citizens of the united states. on the contrary, they were at that time considered as a subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been subjugated by the dominant race, and, whether emancipated or not, yet remained subject to their authority, and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held the power and the government might choose to grant them. what fallacy can you identify and discredit to develop a counterclaim to this claim?
the idea that citizens have rights and privileges that are guaranteed in the constitution

the idea that noncitizens cannot claim certain rights and privileges in the constitution

the idea that the plaintiff considers himself a citizen and therefore has rights and privileges

the idea that african american people are inferior based on perceptions from an earlier time

Answers: 1

Show answers

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 20:10

Clearly show? ramona: anna, where does the theme seem to change? anna: according the article: "the fault lies with the fda's inability to release enough information in order to regain the public's trust. but perhaps japan is to blame as well. although there are plans to remove the spent nuclear fuel rods and build a permafrost wall around the four damaged reactors, is this really enough to recover damaged trust? " and then sato goes on to explain this statement. o a. challenging established ideas o b. using evidence to support your conclusions o c. asking clarifying questions o d. synthesizing claims into a single conclusion

Answers: 3

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 07:50

“simile” by n. scott momaday what did we say to each other that now we are as the deer who walk in single file with heads high with ears forward with eyes watchful with hooves always placed on firm ground in whose limbs there is latent flight source: momaday, n. scott. “simile.” the language of literature. new york: mcdougal littell, 2006. 265. print. which of the following techniques does this poem use? i. simile ii. sensory imagery iii. allusion i and ii i and iii ii and iii i only

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 12:30

Which passage is an example of inductive reasoning? o a. reina's fingers hurt when she plays the guitar for two hours a day. she tells her mother that all guitarists feel pain when they play for a long time. o b. erin thinks blue shirts are the latest fashion trend. she sees many girls at her school wearing blue shirts and decides to buy one for herself. c. daniela thinks that watching too much tv can ruin your eyesight she consults a research book on optometry to find data that support her theory. d. beth argues that eating sweets can rot your teeth. she gets information from her dentist about the number of cavities in patients who eat a lot of candy.

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 14:30

In the new york times article "radio listeners in panic," what was the purpose of including stories of mass hysteria caused by the radio broadcast of the war of the worlds?

Answers: 1

Answer

You know the right answer?

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred scott v. sandford, written by justice taney....

Questions