Which claim would alan weisman most likely agree with? a) natrue will never recover from humanity´s destructiveness b) new york city lack a viable ecosytem for supporting life. c) nature is more powerful than it at first apears. d) people have almost no real effect on the enviroment

C) Nature is more powerful than it at first appears.

Explanation:

In The World Without Us, Alan Weisman describes a post-apocalyptic world in which there are no humans anymore. He imagines what the world would look like without us, and whether the Earth would be able to recover from the damage we have inflicted on it. He concludes that nature is more powerful than it at first appears, and that most of the Earth would be able to continue just as before, with some minor adaptations and very little left of our legacy.

i think it could possibly be b

imparadis't in one anothers arms  

the happier eden, shall enjoy their fill  

of bliss on bliss, while i to hell am thrust,  

where neither joy nor love, but fierce desire,  

among our other torments not the least,  

still unfulfill'd with pain of longing pines;  

yet let me not forget what i have gain'd  

from their own mouths; all is not theirs it seems:  

one fatal tree there stands of knowledge call'd,  

forbidden them to taste: knowledge forbidd'n?  

suspicious, reasonless. why should their lord  

envie them that? can it be sin to know,