Can you check if there is any grammar mistakes in the paragraph?
the reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not implementing high taxes on cigarettes would have a social advantage. the article strongly postulates that raising the taxes on cigarettes would have more than one benefit for smokers. on the other hand, the listening adamantly opposed that forcing high taxes on cigarettes would benefit smokers, and she believes it has more drawbacks.

The reading passage and the lecture have conflicting opinions about whether or not implementing high taxes on cigarettes, would have a social advantage. The article strongly postulates that raising the taxes on cigarettes would have more than one benefit for smokers. On the other hand, the listening adamantly opposed that forcing high taxes on cigarettes would benefit smokers, and she believes it has more drawbacks. Its fine hope it is helpful and plz mark brainliest.

in this passage from chapter 6 of "animal farm", by george orwell, what the author is ridiculing in this passage is the frivolity of some rules.

clover, the mare, believes she remembers that the fourth commandment forbade sleeping in beds because it was something that humans did. snowball, napoleon, and the pigs are brain-workers who look after the welfare of the farm. they are the obvious leaders because they are smart, and so they are entitled to eat the best food and sleep in beds. it is squealer, who says these lines making the difference between sleeping with sheets, what humans do, and sleeping in beds, what pigs do. the unwillingness to question authority makes the oppressed to obey without thinking.

hm, switch the relative; nominative and indefinite; objective ? not too bright in the knowledge of the english.