Which of the following is a strong reason to consider counter-arguments in an argument?

a. counter-arguments can lead to more research.
b. counter-arguments usually summarize your argument.
c. counter-arguments are generally easy to refute.
d. counter-arguments establish the authority of sources.

A, because giving only one half of an argument without the counter leads to misinformation

I too believe that the best answer to the question: Which of the following is a strong reason to consider counter-arguments in an argument, is: A: counter-arguments can help lead to more research.

Explanation:

In academic writing, one that that is vital is research, and how much knowledge a person shows when posing a thesis on a subject. The use of counter-arguments, which are statements that open up the possibility that a thesis might have a different result, or even be mistaken, shows objectivity, but also, that the person writing the essay has prepared, has read, and has enough knowledge on the topic, which has been acquired from proper research. When a person has a counter-argument in his research paper, he must seek more sources, and information, in order to back up the thesis and not let it fail before the counter argument.

jeffree star uploaded a new

i do not the question is put in the corrorect order