Read the paragraph. the question of whether or not to allow cell phones in school is an important one. cell phones are a monumental distraction to young people whose attention should be focused on learning. however, they do serve a purpose in that phones allow students to communicate with their parents. plus, cell phones are great for taking pictures with friends. in all, cell phone use at school must be carefully regulated. which best explains the inconsistency in writing used in this paragraph? it does not maintain a single point of view. it does not maintain appropriate verb tense. it does not maintain the same tone throughout. it does not maintain the same style throughout.

Option C:- It does not maintain the same tone throughout.

Explanation:

In this paragraph, both advantages and disadvantages of cell phone are discussed. This paragraph deals with advantages and disadvantages both at the same time so it does not maintain a constant tone throughout the paragraph. Disadvantage of cell phone is that it distracts the young people whose focus should be on education. Also it states about the advantages of cell phone like it helps the students to connect with their parents. Further it also helps in taking pictures with friends. Thus it talks about both advantages and disadvantages simultaneously, not maintaining the same tone throughout.

it is C just took the unit test review

Explanation:

C. it does not maintain the same tone throughout.

the answer is definitely d. sorry for a late response.

explanation:

the intellectual community is a place like a university where people with high marks, or original thought or an outstanding interest in something gather. they take classes together. they discuss things. they argue sometimes, and not always in a friendly way. but if they argue, it is because they are passionate about something, and there is nothing the matter with that.

lately i've been hearing rumors that it is not the way it was when i went to school. the one thing all schools used to have was free speech. the 1st amendment rights were sacred. now i'm hearing they are not. students can be reported and disciplined for giving an off the wall opinion.

that is shameful.

intellectual ideas are meant to be discussed. they are meant to be chewed up and worked on. that is the primary responsibility of every intellectual community. if that is not the way it is, then that is not a school to go to.

social media, in my opinion, and this is just an opinion. i wouldn't take it too seriously, complicates everything to do with human communication. you can want to share things and others feel they have the right to be very critical or sarcastic or mean about what you share. lack of respect is an immeasurable intolerable condition and social media abounds with that sort of thing.

one of the things i really like about is how careful people are because they must have some idea that the mods are exactly what the word says they are. they police this board very well, and what is so remarkable about them is that they are no older than the average grade 12 student.

my hat goes off to them (which means i respect them quite a bit).