Aman who lost his arms in a terrorist attack gives an impassioned plea for tougher anti-terrorism laws. those listening to this speech should wonder a) if the speaker is repressing emotion. b) if the speaker lost any jobs as a result of the attack. c) if the speaker can think objectively about the issue. d) if the speaker's injuries might be even worse than he is letting on.

C)if the speaker can think objectively about the issue.

Explanation:

A man who was injured in a terrorist attack is unlikely to be able to be objective about politics and terrorism. He probably feels a strong personal connection with the subject. Moreover, he is likely to think about terrorism in a personal way, and not in a way that addresses the needs of all people. Therefore, the audience should be aware of this fact so that they can more easily spot prejudice or bias in his speech.

i think the best choice would be as follows: establishing the meaning of words in english and spanish. hope this

for this, you need to remember something significant in your own life, for example, if you were bullied when you were younger, you can mention your memories on this and touch on how such treatment can harm other kids your age either physically or mentally. (racism, car crashes, a parent in the hospital are all very good subjects, think hard on it! )

hope i ! : )