Me
when a vindication of the rights of woman was first published, it caused great public outcry, not only because of its content but also because of its straightforward, blunt style. in those days, people were not accustomed to women’s speaking their minds. write an essay that defines wollstonecraft’s style. do you think her style would be considered blunt by today’s standards?

i dont know man it proably will because Computer engineers chose to introduce randomness into computers in the form of pseudorandom number generators. As the name suggests, pseudo-random numbers are not truly random.

Rather, they are computed from a mathematical formula or simply taken from a precalculated

list. A lot of research has gone into pseudo-random number theory and modern algorithms for

generating them are so good that the numbers look exactly like they were really random. Pseudorandom numbers have the characteristic that they are predictable, meaning they can be predicted

if you know where in the sequence the first number is taken from. For some purposes, predictability

is a good characteristic, for others it is not.

Random numbers are used for computer games but they are also used on a more serious scale

for the generation of cryptographic keys and for some classes of scientific experiments. For scientific

experiments, it is convenient that a series of random numbers can be replayed for use in several

experiments, and pseudo-random numbers are well suited for this purpose. For cryptographic use,

however, it is important that the numbers used to generate keys are not just seemingly random;

they must be truly unpredictable

Explanation:

Students may or may not feel that Wollstonecraft's style is blunt by today's standards. Whichever answer they choose, their essays should provide support for their point of view.

Explanation:

first one is your answer

~coco