According to the professors in fahrenheit 451, is it better to have book you can physically hold or a book that’s committed to your memory? explain why

to have a book you can physically hold

Explanation:

According to the professor in Fahrenheit 451, it was better to have a book that you can physically hold. He explained that nothing compares to the adventure of owning a physical book; from the moment you touch it, to the moment you open it and scroll through the pages to the moment you read the last words. For the professor reading books was an experience and he preferred physical books, because in that way he could experience the same story every time he wanted (every time he opened and read the book).

faulty parallelism is a construction in which two or more parts of a sentence are equivalent in meaning but not grammatically similar in form.

the correct version of this faulty parallelism in the sentence is:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.

the problem is the last sentence, the first two have a basic subject+verb+object structure.

so, to give a proper balance to the structure, or better said, to give a parallel structure, we must write a basic s+v+o structure in all three sentences:

the hikers knew that the hike was six miles, that it usually required the entire day, and it would not be wise to start after 10: 00 a.m.