Suppose a person rescues a child from drowning. he accepts an unsolicited reward from the parent. is this moral? what if it is a token gift? is it moral if he donates the reward to charity? suppose a man rescues someone only after a reward is offered. has he done a moral act?

Yes, receiving the gift was moral as long as the gift was given on a basis of personal value (a token) over monetary value.

While donating the gift may seem morally right at first, if the gift was of sentimental and personal value to the person who initially gave it, they may not want the item donated. This is especially true for heirlooms.

If someone is only rescued because a reward is offered, then the person was in the morally wrong although what they did was just. In a dire situation, a person should always be helped.

i would like to compare these two interpretations of the crucible : 1) eric christ's interretation and wade bradford's interpretation. the main differences between there interretaions is that in the first one you can notice direct link to joseph mccarthy whereas the second one represents how the town is filled with hysteria.the second interpretation shows that author believes that the story   about puritan town in salem is based on actual events while the first example shows the sencible reference to sort of bias.

answer: the first one climax ,the second   is plot

explanation: