This question is based in the crucible 7. page 461, exposition: explain the paradox that miller refers to in the final section of the exposition. a paradox is a statement that seems to contradict itself, but may nevertheless suggest an important truth. how does the paradox illuminate the playwright’s perspective on his subject?

since it is asking for her reaction to elnora's trouble at school you can rule out any answers with a positive response (b). then you can rule out (d), this is because it does not show the mother's reaction but the daughter's response. that leaves you with two options (a) and (c), by looking at the options you can rule out (c) because it isn't referring back to elnora's issues at school.

after the signature of the treaty of versailles in june 1919, germany lost nearly 25,000 square miles and a population of 7 million people. these territories included eupen-malmedy area and moresnet which were ceded to belgium. regarding relations with france, germany ceded the sovereignty of the saar coal mines to this country, as well as the provinces of alsace-lorraine.

explanation:

i believe that is the truth if thats what you where asking for

a omg *hides wit stranger*