Thesis: the legal driving age should be raised to 18 because teenage drivers are involved in too many accidents. which is an example of a counter-argument to the thesis above? o a. many teenagers under 18 need to drive to get to school or work o b. raising the driving age to 18 will not drivers do better in school o c. teens pay higher insurance premiums because they are bad drivers o d. schools should provide driver's training courses for teenage drivers

A. Many teenagers under 18 need to drive to get to school or work

Explanation:

The claim asks for the rise of the driving age to 18 and the given reason is that younger drivers drive recklessly. The implict idea is, then, that good driving has to do with age: the older the driver, the better he drives. The counterclaim holds that there are teenagers ,younger than 18, that need to drive because they have responsibilities. If they have responsibilities, such as going to school or going to work, it can be inferred they are not reckless.

second person

explanation:

note the heavy uses of "you", "your", as well as "he".

~