If a regulation were adopted by school officials forbidding discussion of the vietnam conflict, or the expression by any student of opposition to it anywhere on school property except as part of a prescribed classroom exercise, it would be obvious that the regulation would violate the constitutional rights of students.
which is the best summary of the passage?
a. "if a regulation were adopted by school officials forbidding discussion of the vietnam conflict," except as a class activity, it would be clear that the rule "would violate the constitutional rights of students."
b. the majority opinion, correctly, in my view, argues that the rights of the poor students who can only express their views on vietnam during a ridiculous class activity are clearly violated.
c. in tinker v. des moines justice fortas argues that it would be obvious that students' rights are violated "if a regulation were adopted by school officials forbidding discussion of the vietnam conflict . . except as part of a prescribed classroom exercise."
d. in his majority opinion on tinker v. des moines, justice fortas argues that if students were not allowed to talk about vietnam at school, unless as a class activity, it would be an obvious violation of their rights.

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)