In the "adrift in a moral sea" section of "lifeboat ethics" garrett hardin compares a wealthy country like united states to a lifeboat. is this an accurate comparison to prove his argument that rich nations should not the poor nations? why or why not? be sure to us details from the essay to support your point.

glamis thou art, and cawdor; and shalt be what thou art promis'd; yet do i fear thy nature; it is too full o' the milk of human kindness to catch the nearest way: thou wouldst be great; art not without ambition; but without the illness should attend it. what thou wouldst highly, that wouldst thou holily; wouldst not play false, and yet wouldst wrongly win: thou'dst have, great glamis, that which cries, "thus thou must do, if thou have it: and that which rather thou dost fear to do than wishest should be undone." hie thee hither, that i may pour my spirits in thine ear; and chastise with the valor of my tongue all that impedes thee from the golden round, which fate and metaphysical aid doth seem to have thee crown'd withal.  

he lacks ambition.  

he is hesitant.  

he lacks courage.  

he has moral scruples.

hello there!

if i was with a celebrity, i would be with andrew lincoln from the walking dead. this is because i love his work he has done in the show and he is a great actor!