You are conducting research on the miranda rights and you collect five sources. all the articles
are written by experts, but one of them has conflicting information that does not match up with
the others. why would you use this article in your research?
you use the article because you researched the author and the sources for
credibility.
you use the article without additional research because it is the only credible source.
you use the article because you want to give your reader conflicting information.
you use the article because it came up in
your search which confirms its credibility.

Clearly show? ramona: anna, where does the theme seem to change? anna: according the article: "the fault lies with the fda's inability to release enough information in order to regain the public's trust. but perhaps japan is to blame as well. although there are plans to remove the spent nuclear fuel rods and build a permafrost wall around the four damaged reactors, is this really enough to recover damaged trust? " and then sato goes on to explain this statement. o a. challenging established ideas o b. using evidence to support your conclusions o c. asking clarifying questions o d. synthesizing claims into a single conclusion

Read the passage below and answer the question. marcus had a reputation for being craven. no one had ever seen him do a single brave thing. using context clues, how would you define the word craven in the passage? intense courageous cowardly thoughtful

What happened after gandhi’s quit india speech?