subject
English, 29.07.2019 21:20 waterbug7571

In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. determine the type of plagiarism.
original source material
if learners are new to critique, we see anonymity as a scaffold to generating critical feedback. learners can practice giving feedback knowing they are not vulnerable to social repercussions. less than perfect expressions, unwarranted negative reactions, and fruitless ideas are bound to be part of novice feedback, but teachers hope to create learning configurations that support both the giver and the receiver of feedback, especially if the commenters are novices.
references:
howard, c. d., barrett, a. f., & frick, t. w. (2010). anonymity to promote peer feedback: pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. journal of educational computing research, 43(1), 89-112.
student version
if providing peer feedback is a skill to be learned then perhaps it is advisable to give learners opportunities to practice giving feedback knowing they are not vulnerable to social repercussions. in this way, anonymity can act "as a scaffold to generating critical feedback" (howard, barrett, & frick, 2010, p. 104).
references:
howard, c. d., barrett, a. f., & frick, t. w. (2010). anonymity to promote peer feedback: pre-service teachers' comments in asynchronous computer-mediated communication. journal of educational computing research, 43(1), 89-112.
which of the following is true for the student version above?
a. word-for-word plagiarism
b. paraphrasing plagiarism
c. this is not plagiarism

ansver
Answers: 3

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 16:00
What sound device is used in the following excerpt from how the animals lost their tails and got them back traveling from philadelphia to medicine hat by carl sandburg
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:00
2dogs and 2 humans how many people are there? animals are considered as people too?
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:20
Which is an example of finding common ground when addressing a counter argument? a. products with genetically modified organisms (gmos) in them are frankenfoods that are unnatural, dangerous, and foul tasting. b. it’s really not important that some people feel texting while driving isn’t a big deal; it’s a fact that it’s dangerous and should be illegal. c. while both sides agree that processed foods are more convenient, the damage they do to a person’s health should not be ignored. d. testing on animals has produce several lifesaving vaccines and medicines that have saved countless human lives.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:30
Truth is one that’s been valid for centuries.
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. determ...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 16.07.2019 06:00
Questions on the website: 13722361