In legal reasoning, the facts of a case suggest that there is an issue. this issue may already be governed by a rule of law. when the facts are compared to the rule, an analysis of the case can be developed. from this analysis, a _[blank]_ can be made as to whether or not the _[blank]_ applies to the _[blank]_.
which three words, in order, best complete the statement?
a-conclusion; rule; facts
b-conclusion; issue; rule
c-rule; conclusion; issue
d-rule; issue; analysis

Answer asap the importance of being earnest 20. briefly explain two ways the play is either reflective of the victorian culture or shows the influence of restoration comedy. respond in complete sentences.

Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.

Hur ! asap what is the structure of the following sentence? although i have already visited africa, i would certainly like to return. a) compound b) compound-complex c) complex d) simple