English, 24.09.2019 03:10 briannabo08

Which evidence best supports the claim in an argumentative essay that the voting age should be changed to sixteen?
a blog by a sixteen-year-old who works for a presidential campaign
a science magazine article about how sixteen-year-olds view adults
a research study showing that sixteen-year-olds can understand complex issues
a newspaper article about sixteen-year-olds in different cultures around the world

Answers: 1

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: radusevciuc7719

I think its the 3rd choice

Answer from: Zacwn7871

I believe the best answer to be letter C as well:

a research study showing that sixteen-year-olds can understand complex issues.

Explanation:

If we are writing an essay and want to support the claim that the voting age should be changed to sixteen, we need to find evidence that will clearly help defend the idea that 16-year-olds are perfectly capable of voting with awareness. Now, let's briefly analyze each one of our options:

- The first option could be useful as an example inside our supporting evidence, but not as supporting evidence on its own. Readers might very well claim that having one 16-year-old with political awareness is far from proving that all of them are the same.

- The second option is too general. Although voting involves the way in which 16-year-olds perceive adults, the article does not revolve around the theme in a political way. And, depending on what the article shows, it might work against our claim instead of for it.

- Voting and politics are complex issues. Therefore, if we can prove that 16-year-olds are completely capable of understanding complex issues, we might link that proof to our claim that they can vote. There would be no reason to believe they wouldn't be able to comprehend the details involving elections and candidates.

- Finally, the newspaper article about 16-year-olds in different cultures around the world might and might not help. It really depends on what point of view it takes concerning the subject. It could have some valuable information, but it could also contain nothing of validity for our topic. Again, it is too general.

Answer from: Quest

answer: this is easy, i found "it"

i will repeat the question again, "find it."

here, i located it.

90% will fail! a lonely panda is among the crowd of hundreds of snowmans. why he's there? nobody b

Answer from: Quest

the

Another question on English

English, 22.06.2019 00:30

What causes cassius to delay killing caesar? a. the crowds around caesar b. a violent storm c. brutus’s reluctance d. the disorganization it the resistance

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 05:00

What is the speaker telling the grecian urn in these lines from “ode on a grecian urn”? he wishes the urn could talk so he could hear its stories. he knows the urn will still be around for others to see after he is dead. he fears that when he gets old, the urn will suffer because nobody else will take care of it. he wishes the people frozen on the urn could warm up and come to life.

Answers: 2

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 07:30

You often figure out what a word means by looking at the surrounding ideas, and this is also known as: using peripheral vision using common concepts using context clues using a dictionary

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 10:30

Is the underlined word a predicate nominative or a predicate adjective? could that animal have been an alligator or a *crocodile*? a. predicate adjective b. predicate nominative crocodile is the underlined word.

Answers: 3

Answer

You know the right answer?

Which evidence best supports the claim in an argumentative essay that the voting age should be chang...

Questions