(1) producers of reality shows are being smart, not unethical, when they give their "actors” scripts to follow. (2) if producers had to follow everyone around waiting for an exciting event to occur, they would never make their deadlines to produce the episodes. (3) therefore, scripted reality shows reflect efficient planning, not sheer deceit. (4) furthermore, the scripts do not change the fact that the shows are based on the real lives of the "actors.” (5) for example, if a reality show were about an interior decorator, the producer would never give the decorator a script related to running a restaurant. (6) the producer would, of course, always create scripts that related to decorating.

which revision would best improve the connections between ideas and the flow of the paragraph?

adding a fact to improve the logic of sentence 2
moving sentence 3 to the end of the paragraph
adding a transitional phrase to sentence 4
using an analogy to describe a restaurant in sentence 5

B/ Moving sentence 3 to the end of the paragraph

Explanation// has a transition word to start a new paragraph

The revision that would best improve the connections between ideas and the flow of the paragraph is moving sentence 3 to the end of the paragraph

Explanation:

Moving sentence 3 to the end of the paragraph would make a summary of the paragraph, which will be the best way to finish it, besides the other options are not possible since it is not necessary to add facts to sentence 2, sentence 4 already has a transition word and, using analogies to describe a restaurant does not give necessary or related information to the paragraph.

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.

alright no problem, cool