subject
English, 06.10.2019 11:30 dejanaej6

Read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred
scott v. sandford, written by justice taney
which statement best describes the fallacy in this
passage?
the question before us is, whether the class of persons
described in the plea in abatement compose a portion of
this people, and are constituent members of this
sovereignty? we think they are not, and that they are not
included, and were not intended to be included, under the
word "citizens" in the constitution, and can therefore claim
none of the rights and privileges which that instrument
provides for and secures to citizens of the united states
on the contrary, they were at that time considered as a
subordinate and inferior class of beings, who had been
subjugated by the dominant race, and whether
emancipated or not yet remained subject to their authority,
and had no rights or privileges but such as those who held
the power and the government might choose to grant
them
o justice taney assumes that the writers of the
constitution would agree with him about citizenship
o justice taney uses the argument that african americans
are not citizens to prove that they are not citizens.
justice taney assumes that the other justices on the
court would agree with him about citizenship
justice taney uses the argument that dred scott is an
enslaved person to prove that he is not a citizen
mark this and return
save and exit
nexi
submit

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 21:00
What influenced robert louis stevenson's writingstyle?
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 00:30
According to huxley, what is the main reason why people use language inappropriately when discussing war
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 04:30
Around, blank character is one who changes and grows as a result of the conflict in the story.
Answers: 1
question
English, 22.06.2019 06:40
Activity construct an argument about a topic, theme, or idea that you read about in william shakespeare's romeo and juliet, act ii or act iii. make sure you create a central claim for your argument that is debatable. provide textual evidence from the play to support your argument. here are some ideas for your essay. notice how each topic is focused and specific. you may write about one of these topics or choose your own focused and specific topic: discuss juliet's level of maturity and compare it to romeo's. compare how the two characters react to the events after their marriage, when romeo is banished from verona. discuss the balcony scene. does the knowledge of romeo and juliet's final fate influence the meaning of the balcony scene or the audience's interpretation of it? discuss the characters of tybalt and romeo as they relate to the theme of family and the theme of love. explain how the character of tybalt develops the theme of family and how the character of romeo develops the theme of romantic love. discuss the character of friar laurence. what motivates him to romeo and juliet to defy their parents? part a choose a topic based on what you read in act ii or act iii of romeo and juliet. then write a thesis statement. part b identify two or three short excerpts from the play as textual evidence to support your thesis statement. part c write a 300-word essay arguing the thesis of your analysis. (i mainly need on part b and c)
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the passage from the opinion of the court in dred
scott v. sandford, written by justice t...
Questions
Questions on the website: 13722362