Reread this sentence from paragraph 4 "no one can argue against increased efficiency, and the use of rbst makes dairy farms more efficient." which is the best evaluation of the reasoning in this sentence

1. the reasoning is faulty because the statement is an example of a wrong-cause fallacy.

2. the reasoning supports a logical argument because it provides an expert opinion.

3.the reasoning is faulty because it makes the over generalization that no one can argue against increased efficacy.

4.the reasoning supports a logical argument because efficiency is a concept that can be supported with facts and statistics.

answer: lol you have autism

explanation: lol you have autism

answer: hjnh

explanation:

hhjjk

i am a strong (insert gender here) my father and his brother were to, they were killed not by the cold, not by the bears or wolves that roam our streets at night, but by the   bolsheviks. we must stand up and fight communism or we all end up dead, starved dehydrated, enslaved. the time is now we must fight. lenin is a dangerous man but he can be stopped. so my comrades we shall siege there weapons tonight on ward. (rides away with ak(not invented yet) and sword in hand while on bear into snowstorm)

based on the graph, people who are asian/ pacific islander, are better at math than the other race/ethnicity's on the graph.