Which statement best explains how the authors develop their claim across the two passages?
both passages show the historical details that led the abolitionists to support the american revolution.
both passages develop the idea that boycotting could bring attention to people who were treated unfairly, including enslaved people.
both passages support the claim that intelligent people will overcome harmful governments.
both passages show that there was little connection between the sugar trade and the rise of slavery in north america.

How does this image the reader to understand seismographs?

The courage that my mother had went with her, and is with her still: rock from new england quarried; now granite in a granite hill. the golden brooch my mother wore she left behind for me to wear; i have no thing i treasure more: yet, it is something i could spare. oh, if instead she'd left to me the thing she took into the grave! - that courage like a rock, which she has no more need of, and i have. based on the 2nd stanza, how does the speaker feel about the golden brooch that was passed down from the mother to child? question 2 options: a: the speaker thinks it was a waste of money b: the speaker places a high value on the item c: the speaker never wears the brooch d: the speaker feels it could be easily replaced

How might stacey feel when t. j. comes to the logan house in the middle of the night? describe a connection that you answer the question.