In listing the men by name, the author
a) gives them added importance.
b) implies that they weren't effective.
c) questions why other men weren't named.
d) argues against those who would condemn them.

idk bc i’m not close to being smart

i think it's either 'to expose the corruption of the communists in russia', or 'to criticize animal brutality by communists in russia.'  

hope this ! : )

coin toss of the tosses to the toss