Compares and contrasts the experience of listening to the poem to the experience of reading it.
uses specific examples and textual support to explain your ideas.

It's obvious that there's like a worksheet or something that you need to work off of, and since I don't have a copy of it, I'll try to explain as best I can from my own experience.

There's obviously a difference between listening to and reading a poem. When listening, it can be incredibly moving or incredibly dull. It depends on how the presenter reads the poem out loud. Sometimes people give it their all, and you can hear it in the way they read, giving emphasis and adding emotion where needed. Other readers don't really do anything. They simply read the words that's on the page, which takes away from what could've been a great poem.

However, when you're reading one, you can do it however you want. One tends to read in a way that makes sense to them. For example, you could read at a very fast rate, or a slow one, maybe you give certain characters or lines a specific voice, or maybe you just give everyone the same voice. Stuff like that.

Again, I don't know what it is that you need examples and textual support from, so this is just my personal experience.

i will have to go with 1.

hope this !

given the fact that the question is about the detail that best support the idea that oppressive leaders use   propaganda to achieve thir goals,   the first option does not refer to any kind of propaganda, since it only tells about that the milk and the windfall apple should be reserved for the pigs. in the second option, that is, "snowball and napoleon sent out flights of pigeons whose instructions were to mingle with the animals on the neighbouring farms, tell them the story of the rebellion, and teach them the tune of "beasts of england". it can be identified that the oppressors make use of the propaganda, which is represented by the pigeons, and the information they have to tell other animals about what was happening in the farm in order to get their objectives. for that reason, the right answer is the second option, taking into account that the third option do not refer to propaganda since it only talks about that they did not want jones back. and, finally, the last option refers to the result of the given news, but it does not mean about the propaganda they used to achieve their goals.