subject
English, 05.12.2019 06:31 mahagonylabeyta

Read the passage from "by the waters of babylon.”

my father is a priest; i am the son of a priest. i have been in the dead places near us, with my father—at first, i was afraid. when my father went into the house to search for the metal, i stood by the door and my heart felt small and weak. it was a dead man's house, a spirit house. it did not have the smell of man, though there were old bones in a corner. but it is not fitting that a priest's son should show fear. i looked at the bones in the shadow and kept my voice still.

what does the narrator’s response to the setting reveal about his character?

by describing the details of a spirit house, he reveals why he gives in to his fear.
because he is not able to show fear, he wishes that he were not a priest’s son.
due to his upbringing, we see that he is prepared for whatever the future holds.
in describing his past, he shows that he will live up to his father’s expectations.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 13:30
Which of these details is not relevant to the paragraph? jane addams was born in cedarville, illinois, in 1860. as the daughter of well-off mill owner, jane always had her needs cared for. while she traveled through england in her late twenties, she and her friend, ellen g. starr, traveled to a house where poor people could sleep, eat, and learn. inspired by this, jane and ellen started a similar establishment, called hull house, in chicago, illinois. people living in the city could get a meal, learn, and rest at hull house. the founders soon became famous for their work, and their efforts many poor people in chicago. for her work, jane was awarded the nobel peace prize in 1931.
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 17:50
Which words most the reader understand the meaning of usurpers
Answers: 3
question
English, 21.06.2019 23:30
Read the excerpt from elie wiesel’s all rivers run to the sea. why were those trains allowed to roll unhindered into poland? why were the tracks leading to birkenau never bombed? i have put these questions to american presidents and generals and to high-ranking soviet officers. since moscow and washington knew what the killers were doing in the death camps, why was nothing done at least to slow down their “production”? that not a single allied military aircraft ever tried to destroy the rail lines converging on auschwitz remains an outrageous enigma to me. birkenau was “processing” ten thousand jews a day. stopping a single convoy for a single night—or even for just a few hours—would have prolonged so many lives. based on the paragraph, the author would most likely agree that it is best to avoid confrontation at all costs. people need to be proactive when they witness an injustice. countries should remain neutral to keep alliances strong. moscow and washington are to be blamed for the holocaust.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:20
Ineed with chapter 8 love aubrey chapter summary
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
Read the passage from "by the waters of babylon.”

my father is a priest; i am the son o...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 04.09.2020 01:01
question
Geography, 04.09.2020 02:01
question
History, 04.09.2020 02:01
Questions on the website: 13722362