Read the sentence.
jimmy carter's presidency was marked by several major national and international crises.
is this thesis sentence too broad, too narrow, or balanced in scope?
too broad
balanced
too narrow

the use supports it by making it seem like the dictators are not bad to the people when the truly are.

paine is arguying that they had tried everything before coming to the conclusion that they needed to fight for their freedom.

argument: "every quiet method for peace hath been ineffectual."

claim 1: "our prayers have been rejected with disdain; and only tended to convince us, that nothing flatters vanity, or confirms obstinacy in kings more than repeated petitioning and nothing hath contributed more than that very measure to make the kings of europe absolute."

claim 2: "wherefore, since nothing but blows will do, for god’s sake, let us come to a final separation, and not leave the next generation to be cutting throats, under the violated unmeaning names of parent and child."