Rachels doubts the truth of cultural relativism for which of the following reasons? Group of answer choices

1. It rests on an invalid argument.
2. It has certain consequences that make it implausible on its face.
3. all of the above
4. The extent of cultural disagreement is not as significant as cultural relativists usually imply.

3). All of the above.

Explanation:

Cultural relativism is demonstrated as the concept associated with determining the meaning or understanding of social norms, beliefs, ideas, or practices in their particular cultural context relatively.

As per the question, all the given options correctly exemplify the reasons for which Rachel doubting the truth of cultural relativism. 'It rests on invalid argument' as cultural relativism prevents an individual from judging a specific social norm morally or ethically as per the standards but rather views in a defined context. 'Implausible consequences' that it brings would include 'conflicts aroused by disagreement between various social norms'(and not following the moral standards). 'The cultural disagreement' would be the product of this conflict which would not be that significant as it has not room for ethics and moral standards of values and judgments. Thus, all the options are correct.

active voice: my father cut the tree.

passive voice: the tree was cut by my father.

active voice: people buy newspapers every day.

passive voice: newspapers are bought (by people) every day.

active voice: people have been using movies as political propaganda since world war ii.

passive voice: movies have been used as political propaganda since world war ii.

active voice: donna gave me my birthday present.

passive voice: i was given my birthday present (by donna). / my birthday present was given to me (by donna).

active voice: mom will leave the keys on the counter.

passive voice: the keys will be left (by mom) on the counter.

the words in parentheses are the agent of the passive voice and can be omitted when obvious, generic, or simply unnecessary.

in this passage from chapter 6 of "animal farm", by george orwell, what the author is ridiculing in this passage is the frivolity of some rules.

clover, the mare, believes she remembers that the fourth commandment forbade sleeping in beds because it was something that humans did. snowball, napoleon, and the pigs are brain-workers who look after the welfare of the farm. they are the obvious leaders because they are smart, and so they are entitled to eat the best food and sleep in beds. it is squealer, who says these lines making the difference between sleeping with sheets, what humans do, and sleeping in beds, what pigs do. the unwillingness to question authority makes the oppressed to obey without thinking.