subject
English, 12.02.2020 16:34 kayranicole1

A medical researcher experimented with the effects of calcium intake on the healing time of broken bones. Peop
similar broken bone injuries were divided randomly into two groups, one of which received a calcium supplemer
which received a placebo. The data showed that there was no significant difference in healing times between the
the researcher concluded that calcium intake has no effect on bone healing time. Why is the conclusion of the re
justified?
The researcher did not use a control group.
The bone injuries in different people cannot be compared.
The overall calcium intake of the two groups was not considered.
The data can only give a statistical probability, so no conclusion can be made.

ansver
Answers: 2

Another question on English

question
English, 21.06.2019 18:00
Which revision of this sentence best uses direct characterization?
Answers: 1
question
English, 21.06.2019 21:00
For which cause did swift not write? the tory government the devaluation of irish coins the whig wars under william iii the starvation in ireland
Answers: 3
question
English, 22.06.2019 02:30
The first step in making a mental model for a compare-and-contrast text is a. comparing the two things being described. b. finding important details in the text. c. contrasting the two things being described. d. connecting details to what is already known.
Answers: 2
question
English, 22.06.2019 08:30
Which statement about thoreau's rhetorical style is most accurate?
Answers: 1
You know the right answer?
A medical researcher experimented with the effects of calcium intake on the healing time of broken b...
Questions
question
Mathematics, 20.10.2019 15:00
question
Chemistry, 20.10.2019 15:00
Questions on the website: 13722366