Write an approximately 4 page (1000 words or so) paper that addresses one of the following topics:
1. Look at our society (or an aspect within it, for example, education, business, politics, etc.) and analyze it through Nietzsche’s ideas. Dig deeply and analyze this thoroughly. Through Nietzschean eyes, what does our society (or the educational system, etc. therein) look like?
2. Do you think current American values more closely reflect an egalitarian (Jeffersonian, slave) morality or a more "aristocratic" ("master") morality? As with the above question, you can look at this more generally or more narrowly (looking at the values that are reflected in one aspect of our culture). With this question, in addition to Nietzsche, you are invited to use the ideas found in the Declaration of Independence.
3. Discuss the difference between "master" morality and "slave" morality as it is presented in "‘Good and Evil,’ ‘Good and Bad.’"
4. Why does Nietzsche have a negative view of democracy?
5. Construct a counter-argument to Nietzsche’s ideas. (Do you have a problem with his ideas? Is he missing something?) If you choose this, you MUST first show me you have a clear understanding of what Nietzsche is saying before you go on to critique it. (Your grade will be based primarily on the depth of understanding you display of Nietzsche’s ideas.)
6. You may choose another topic if you wish. The topic must dig into the ideas presented in Nietzsche’s "‘Good and Evil,’ ‘Good and Bad’" and you must get my permission first.

Based on the book, "the boy in the striped pajamas."describe how these circumstances would affect a person’s identity development (crisis, commitment, diffusion, foreclosure, moratorium, achievement.)

Plagiarism quiz read both the paragraph below and the information following it that identifies the source using the american psychological association format. then read each of the numbered statements and determine if each is plagiarized or not. circle “yes” if the statement is plagiarized, “no” if it is not, and then fix the “yes” answers). original source the presence of the taiwanese on everest was a matter of grave concern to most of the other expeditions on the mountain. there was a very real fear that the taiwanese would suffer a calamity that would compel other expeditions to come to their aid, risking further lives, to say nothing of jeopardizing the opportunity for other climbers to reach the summit. but the taiwanese were by no means the only group that seemed egregiously unqualified. camped beside us at base camp was a twenty-five-year-old norwegian climber named peter neby, who announced his intention to make a solo ascent of the southwest face, one of the peak’s most dangerous and technically demanding routes—despite the fact that his himalayan experience was limited to two ascents of neighboring island peak, a 20,274-foot bump that required little more than vigorous walking. krakauer, j. (1998). into thin air: a personal account of the mount everest disaster. new york: anchor books, 122 - 3. student samples yes 1. there was a very real fear that the taiwanese would suffer a calamity that would compel other expeditions to come to their aid(krakauer, 1998). no) 2. many climbers overestimate their abilities, as krakauer (1998) explains when he writes of peter neby, whose himalayan experience in the past “required little more than vigorous walking” (122 - 3). no 3. jon krakauer (1998) discusses other concerns besides those of unpredictable weather and his own climbing group’s capabilities. for example the existence of a taiwanese group on everest was a matter of serious unease to most everyone else on the mountain. yes/no 4. krakauer (1998) states that the taiwanese group was not the only inexpert climbers to attempt mt. everest: camped beside us at base camp was a twenty-five-year-old norwegian climber named peter neby. . [whose] himalayan experience was limited to two ascents of neighboring island peak, a 20,274-foot bump that required little more than vigorous walking (122 – 3). yes/no 5. the author asserts that the taiwanese “were by no means the only group that seemed egregiously unqualified.” yes/no 6. in his book into thin air, jon krakauer (1998) discusses many of the dangers he noted prior to his disastrous attempt to climb mt. everest in 1996. among them were encounters with other groups and individual climbers who were ill-trained and ill-equipped to handle the demands of such a climb.

1point the u.s. declaration of independence is structured logically to lead from premise to conclusion. which statement best completes its flow of reasoning? 1. all people are equally entitled to certain rights. ii. our rights have been violated by the british government. iii. ? o a. americans agree that king george iii is a tyrannical ruler. o b. americans must form their own government to protect their rights. o c. these rights are natural and god-given to all men equally. o d. no one can argue with the list of violations presented herein.