"What must you include in every confidence argument you write in order to receive full points and have a complete argument?"

Answer / Explanation:

To properly answer this question, let us first define what a confidence argument is: A confidence argument highlights the reason for justifying the presence of confidence in a safety argument (a case mostly supported by evidence that a process is safe).

If we now refer back to the narrative of the question, We will now describe what must be included in a confidence arguments to create the overall assurance case for the system. This includes:

Attributes of trustworthiness

Sufficient Confidence must exist in the trustworthiness of asserted solution

Sufficient confidence must exist in the appropriate use of asserted solution

Credible support for asserted solutions

Assurance deficit for asserted solutions. That is, trustworthiness have been identified

Residual assurance deficit for asserted solution. That is, trust worthiness are acceptable

Credible support exist for asserted solution

Assurance deficit for appropriate use of asserted solutions

Argument over each identified residual assurance deficit

Identified residual assurance deficit for appropriate use of asserted solution

Assurance deficit are acceptable

this doesnt make any sense imao

the correct answers are:

c. “never in the history of his people had a man married a woman who spoke a different tongue.”

d. “‘it has never been heard,’ was the verdict of an old man speaking a few weeks later.”

e. “this man had come with others to commiserate with okeke.”