How does this idea enhance Wollstonecraft's argument?
by suggesting that women's assigned roles enslave
them
by suggesting that women need more hired help
by insisting that men explain women's duties to them
by insisting that women have better morals than men

D. by insisting that women have better morals than men

Explanation:

Wollstonecraft's argument mainly states that women must have more responsibilites rather than being wive or performing any of the chores, Wollstonecraft wanted women to be involved in constitution. Hence he put the pont that by institing that women have better morals than men.

in dubai we don't have those but i would love to try it lol

i'm ganna take my horse lol jk anyway bow! hello

no,

explanation:

because they are likely to use their corrupted thought process to get what they want. not what is better for the another reason they shouldn't is since they abused their rights as a us citizen they should have certain rights stripped away from them as punishment, such as the right to vote. due to the lack of proper behavior exemplified   from their actions , it would be hard for people to trust them because of their criminal record.   either directly (in the case of a referendum or ballot initiative) or indirectly (by choosing lawmakers and law enforcers). in fact, we do have certain minimum, objective standards of responsibility and commitment to our laws that we require people to meet before they are given a role in the solemn enterprise of self-government. people who have committed serious crimes against their fellow citizens don’t meet those standards. and those crimes can include such “non-violent felonies” as, say, treason and espionage, or voter fraud and public corruption, white-collar crime and felonies merely “concerning drugs” — like trafficking in fentanyl-laced heroin and selling it to minors, for example. if you’re not willing to follow the law, then you should not have a role in making the law for everyone else.