In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism.

Original Source Material:
From reading educator-authors' revisions, and experiencing confusion myself surrounding how performance measures fit into a design case, I feel the problem arises from how new authors view design cases in relation to scientific experimental studies in education. A designer who is also a researcher must recognize the difference in perspective between a design case and an experimental study which uses a design for teaching and learning. References: Howard, C. D. (2011). Writing and rewriting the instructional design case: A view from two sides. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 2(1), 40-55.

Student Version:
The confusion regarding the way performance measures relate to design cases is explained as stemming from "how new authors view design cases in relation to scientific experimental studies in education" (Howard, 2011, p. 50). The paradigm shift is something that I can see myself struggling with. References: Howard, C. D. (2011). Writing and rewriting the instructional design case: A view from two sides. International Journal of Designs for Learning, 2(1), 40-55.

Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?

a) Word-for-Word plagiarism
b) Paraphrasing plagiarism
c) This is not plagiarism