Team Tryouts
Steve Dawson

1Tonight was the final evening of tryouts for the Hornets high school baseball team. Practice was finished, and the boys rested on the metal dugout bench listening to Coach Ippolito. He thanked everyone for coming out, playing hard, and making this year's tryouts the most challenging yet for the coaching staff, one filled with difficult decisions. "So many enthusiastic players," Coach Ippolito explained, "an overabundance of athletic talent."

2David Carwile surreptitiously glanced at the other candidates out of the corner of his eye, wondering which ones would make the team. Tryouts were simple: Some players would make the team, while others would be cut. David hoped that he would be one of the fortunate ones. As Coach Ippolito talked, David mentally evaluated his performance: In all three facets of the game—hitting, fielding, and pitching—he thought he had done well. "An impressive performance, if I do say so myself," David thought to himself. He fielded flawlessly, hit the ball exceptionally hard, and loudly popped the catcher’s mitt with his fastball.

Which line of dialogue would BEST develop the perspective of Coach Ippolito if you added it to the narrative?

A) "Wow," said Coach Ippolito, "That David kid sure is good. He hits and fields very well and he even throws a mean fastball."
B) "Okay team," said Coach Ippolito, "I expect you all to give your best effort during tryouts. It will be hard work, but it will be rewarding."
C) "Boy," Coach Ippolito wondered aloud, "How can I make the tough decision to cut some of these fantastic players? I worry that I'll make the wrong choice."
D) "I am very proud to be the coach of the baseball team and I will try my best to choose the best team I can during these tryouts," Coach Ippolito told the principal.

The bus driver who, only works weekdays, always waits for me when i'm running latecorrect the comma sandwich

Me for the love of god. i've been working on this assignment for 3 days and i don't understand the speeches at all ive read both 4 times over and i don't understand either of them if your right i will give you brainlest (i think that's how you spell it) and 99 pts. for this assignment, you will write an evaluation of either of two historic passages. • patrick henry’s “give me liberty, or give me death! ” speech (1775) • frederick douglass’s address, “what to the slave is the fourth of july? ” (1852) 1. what is the speaker’s viewpoint? what is his claim? type your answer here. (score for question 2: of 2 points) 2. what reasons does the speaker provide to support his viewpoint or claim? type your answer here. (score for question 3: of 4 points) 3. how valid are the speaker’s reasons for his claim? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 4: of 2 points) 4. what evidence does the speaker provide to support his reasons? type your answer here. (score for question 5: of 4 points) 5. is the speaker’s evidence relevant and sufficient? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 6: of 4 points) 6. does the speaker use fallacious reasoning or logical fallacies? use evidence from the text to support your answers. type your answer here. (score for question 7: of 4 points) 7. what counterclaims or alternate claims does the speaker address, and how does he respond to them? type your answer here. (score for question 8: of 4 points) 8. how effective is the speaker’s response to counterclaims or alternate claims? use evidence from the text to support your answer. type your answer here. (score for question 9: of 4 points) 9. write a one-paragraph evaluation of the speaker’s argument. type your answer here.

As you progressed through old english texts to middle english to modern english, how did your understanding of the literature change?