Define the following debate terms: value criterion, affirmative, negative, constructive, contention, cross-examination, rebuttal, refutation, resolution, flow.

Value criterion: In Lincoln-Douglas Debate, the value criterion (criterion, VC, or standard) is the means of weighing the value premise. Unlike the value premise, the value criterion is often swayed to either the affirmative or negative side.

Affirmative: Definition of affirmative (Entry 2 of 2) 1 : an expression (such as the word yes) of affirmation or assent. 2 : the side that upholds the proposition stated in a debate.

Negative: The negative form of statement, a person or number of persons arguing against a resolution, statement, etc., especially a team upholding the negative side in a formal debate.

Contention: A point advanced or maintained in a debate or argument It is his contention that allowing a casino to be built would not be in the best interests of the city.

Cross-examination: The Cross-examination is the examination of a witness who has already testified in order to check or discredit the witness's testimony, knowledge, or credibility.

Rebuttal: As it pertains to an argument or debate, the definition of a rebuttal is the presentation of evidence and reasoning meant to weaken or undermine an opponent's claim; however, in persuasive speaking, a rebuttal is typically part of a discourse with colleagues and rarely as a stand-alone speech.

Refutation: In rhetoric, refutation is the part of an argument in which a speaker or writer counters opposing points of view.

Resolution: Resolution (debate) In general, a resolution in the context of debate by an assembly is a formulation of a determination, expression of opinion, etc...

Flow: Flowing is the debate term for the general technique used to keep track of what arguments are made (and when, and how they are responded to) during a debate.

the answer is:

b) to show the progression of inventions that took place in the bicycling industry.

hope it !

because he is using a description to provide evidence to support his argument.

hope this could