Both essays focus on The Boy in the Striped Pajamas in discussing the role of fiction in teaching history. But the writers approach the book from different perspectives. Compare and contrast the perspectives. Which argument is more effective and persuasive? How might you suggest making it even stronger? Use textual evidence from both passages to support your response.

The main themes of the play are: fate and free will with the inevitability of oracular predictions is a theme that often occurs in greek tragedies the conflict between the individual and the state similar to that in sophocles’ “antigone” and   people’s willingness to ignore painful truths both oedipus and jocasta clutch at unlikely details in order to avoiding facing up to the inceasingly apparent truth and sight and blindness the irony that the blind seer tiresius can actually “see” more clearly than the supposedly clear-eyed oedipus, who is in reality blind to the truth about his origins and his inadvertent crimes.

You cant, you're going to have to go their page, which is to do that.

Ihope this !