When should evidence be quoted directly and when should it be paraphrased? Identify which approach the student in each scenario should use.

Sally should paraphrase the evidence

George should paraphrase the evidence

Addison should quote the evidence

Alex should quote the evidence

Explanation:

The question is not complete since it does not present the scenarios. The question refers to the scenarios presented in the picture attached.

There are to ways of presenting the evidence when the information coming from the original source is going to be included in the final paper, Quoting the evidence is to add pieces of information as they are in the original but giving full credit to the original author while paraphrasing is to take the information to analyze it and rewrite it in different words and style without affecting the meaning.

dramatic irony occurs when the reader/audience knows more about a character's situation than the character does. the one main effect is that it gives the reader a sense of superiority, or detached superiority. the reader not only seemingly discovers what is revealed, but feels superior for doing so.

what makes a hero is someone who tries and acres and then to save people and it’s not their jobs to save them just a normal person that has no experts of saving people would jump in to action without it twice about doing it. me that’s the defection of a hero!