WILL MARK BRAINLIEST!!

Can someone please help me paraphrase this in their own words? thank you

The tone of Animal Farm is at first fun loving and carefree, yet it turns out to be severe as the story unfurls. The story starts with a tone recommending the peruser is setting out on an externally senseless tale about strange people and talking creatures. The portrayal of both the people and creatures recommends a distracted, disengaged demeanor toward the story. Orwell humanizes the creatures, or, in other words he enables them to talk, however gives them human characteristics and concerns. For instance, Clover the horse "never entirely recovered her figure after her fourth foal" (Chapter 1). The worry with physical appearance causes Clover to appear to be a stupid lady. Be that as it may, as Napoleon's system exacerbates, chilling notes creep in. This harshness is all the all the more striking since it is installed in an in any case lively story. The movement from fun loving nature to upsetting harshness cautions peruses that anyway comfortable life appears, society can without much of a stretch breakdown into loathsomeness and carnage. Simultaneously, by making a senseless, perky, fun story out of the sickening occasions of Stalin's Terror, the novella additionally ridicules Stalin, proposing that at last the Soviet despot is as funny as a talking pig.

The Animal Farm's tone is fun, loving, carefree. But-- as the story progresses, we see the true side after all. The story begins on a high note, with the peruser setting out on constant blabber of senseless and nonsensical tales of strange folk and speaking creatures. The portayal of the people and the creatures recommends the distracted, disengaged demeanor of the story. Orwell gives the creatures almost human-like characteristics (gives them the ability to talk) and concerns, i.e. Clover the horse "never recovered her figure entirely after her fourth foal". The worry with physical appearance to Clover is that it causes her to appear as to be but a stupid lady. Be that as you wish, and as Napoleon's system exacerbates, the chilling hints creep slowly in the further you go on. This harshness is striking, since it's installed in a very lively story. The movement from fun loving nature to very unhappy cautions peruses that any way that comfortable life may appear, society can, without much of a stretch, break down into melancholy lothsomeness and carnage, simultaneously by making a senseless, fun and perky story out of sickening occasions such as Stalin's Terror, the novella additionally ridicules Stalin, proposing that the Soviet despot is at last as funny as a talking pig.

Hope this helped!

Yours Truly,

~William

the answer should be:

the intervention of the supernatural gives gilgamesh hope that he will defeat humbaba.

is this the question?