1. Were George's actions at the end of the novel justified? Why/Why not? In your response, please make sure to: use an appositive, a semicolon and an AAAWWUBBIS complex sentence- BOLD these. state your claim - your clear, concise, stance on the prompt. Make sure to highlight it! use evidence to support your claim (from OMM, obviously). address and discredit (shut down) the counterclaim (using evidence from the text). Please underline your "shut down" of the coutnerclaim. 2. Why do you think the novella ended with Carlson's comment to Curley? What is the symbolism behind this comment? HINT: drowning puppies.

This question is for the book "Of mice and men"

cavern

explanation:

for the crossword

- "a nonrestrictive clause functions as a modifier to a noun (that is an object, person or concept). these clauses can be described by the following three options: it is set off by comas, it contains a subject and a verbs and it adds nonessential information to the sentence.

for example, in "here is bill gates, who confounded microsoft software company" we can identify "who confounded microsoft software company" as a nonrestrictive clause modifying the noun bill gates. this clause can be describes as a nonrestrictive clause because it is separated by a comma, it adds nonessential information to identify who bill gates is and it must contain both a subject (who) and a verb (confounded)."

explanation:

b the manazanar relocation center was located in california. it was used to keep japanise from spying on america.

the reasons for the harsh treatment, is because japan used tourist to take pictures and snapshots of pearl harbor.

many americans were afraid that the japanise would betray them for their mother country. through and means necessary. this means that, the leadership in japan is a lot different than it is here. culture and family ties has much to do with their outlook and worldview.