Which reason would most effectively refute the counterclaim?!

Counterclaim: In addition to writing acclaimed lyrics, Bob Dylan has written both prose and poetry.

I have read Dylan's book of poetry, Tarantula, and his memoir, Chronicles: Volume One, and think that both books

are worthy of the Nobel Prize in Literature. I just don't think that Dylan's song lyrics should be awarded in the

same category as his books.

It is true that Bob Dylan has published traditional poetry and prose. However, neither of the books was very good.

and neither won prestigious awards. If the Nobel Prize in Literature considered all writers of at least two mediocre

books, the award would mean nothing.

It is true that Bob Dylan has published traditional poetry and prose. However, one book of poetry and one memoir

would not qualify him for the prize. The prize was awarded based on his songwriting, which does not qualify as

literature.

Read the excerpt from the war of the worlds.beyond the pit stood the little wedge of people with the white flag at its apex, arrested by these phenomena, a little knot of small vertical black shapes upon the black ground. as the green smoke arose, their faces flashed out pallid green, and faded again as it vanished. then slowly the hissing passed into a humming, into a long, loud, droning noise. slowly a humped shape rose out of the pit, and the ghost of a beam of light seemed to flicker out from it.forthwith flashes of actual flame, a bright glare leaping from one to another, sprang from the scattered group of men. it was as if some invisible jet impinged upon them and flashed into white flame. it was as if each man were suddenly and momentarily turned to fire.then, by the light of their own destruction, i saw them staggering and falling, and their supporters turning to run.which options accurately describe how the author develops the plot in the excerpt? (select all that apply.)the war of the worldsthe narrator does not react at first as he watches the men with the flag and hears the sounds in the pit. his inaction decreases the tension in the plot because the narrator is simply standing by.the narrator does not react at first as he watches the men with the flag and hears the sounds in the pit. his inaction keeps the tension steadily increasing as the narrator comes to realize the men are being killed.the narrator is distracted by his own observations of the men with the white flag and the humming sound, so he doesn't react as quickly as he should when the men are killed, thus extending the tension in the plot.the narrator is attentive to the men with the white flag and the humming sound, so he immediately understands what has happened when the men are killed, increasing the tension in the plot.