English, 09.11.2019 14:31 YungToeSuck

Which statement explains the change in the roman mob’s reaction from the start of act 3.2 to the end of act 3.3? a. the mob remains calm throughout both speeches. b. the mob is angry immediately after brutus’ speech but becomes calm by mark antony’s support of the conspirators. c. the mob weeps and cries throughout both speeches. d. the mob remains calm and supportive after brutus’ speech but becomes enraged by mark antony’s wanting to rebel and kill the conspirators.

Answers: 3

Show answers

Answers

Answer from: sksksjs

"The mob remains calm and supportive after Brutus’ speech but becomes enraged by Mark Antony’s wanting to rebel and kill the conspirators" is the statement that explains the change in the Roman mob’s reaction from the start of act 3.2 to the end of act 3.3. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the last option or option "D".

Answer from: allenpaietonp9v8sv

The correct answer is:

D. The mob remains calm and supportive after Brutus’ speech but becomes enraged by Mark Antony’s wanting to rebel and kill the conspirators.

The statement explains the change in the Roman mob’s reaction from the start of act 3.2 to the end of act 3.3.

Answer from: Quest

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

Answer from: Quest

adverb is the answer i believe.

Another question on English

English, 21.06.2019 17:30

Which of the following best describes the speaker’s feelings about america?

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 21.06.2019 22:00

Read this excerpt from leah missbach day's foreword to wheels of change.bicycles have long played a role in my life. as a young woman, i rode one year-round before i had a car. but it was later in adulthood that the bicycle became more than a source of transportation for me. the bicycle actually began to truly shape the way i saw the world.what is the author's purpose for including this in the foreword?

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 00:30

The true confessions of charlotte doyle and "jonah and the whale" have which theme in common?

Answers: 1

Answer

English, 22.06.2019 01:10

Ineed simplifying this thesis and making it easier to understand for the reader (more concise) "no matter how religious one may be, one’s faith tends to change under unexpected and challenging circumstances."

Answers: 2

Answer

You know the right answer?

Which statement explains the change in the roman mob’s reaction from the start of act 3.2 to the end...

Questions