Which is the best comparison between a speech focusing on a fact and a speech focusing on a value? a. fact: uses spatial order to describe the change in accuracy of an event. value: uses a topical order to present the opinion on the morality of an event, person, or action. b. fact: uses testimony to prove the accuracy of a fact to the audiencevalue: uses analogy to criticize the morality f an event, person, or action. c. fact: uses ethos to prove the accuracy of a fact to the audience. value: uses logos to question the morality of an event, person, or action. d. fact: uses logos to present the accuracy

The best comparison between a speech focusing on a fact and a speech focusing on a value would be the following:

Fact: uses logos to present the accuracy of a fact to the audience

Value: uses pathos to question the morality of an event, person, or action

The correct answer between all the choices given is the last choice or letter D. I am hoping that this answer has satisfied your query and it will be able to help you in your endeavor, and if you would like, feel free to ask another question.

returning points to main account

explanation:

they are direct opposites. they can both be corrupted. they are inseparable.