Read the editorial carefully. Analyze the argument by identifying its claim, reasons, and evidence. Identify any rhetorical devices or logical fallacies used and explain why the author included them.
Article:
Parents should limit the amount of screen time their children are exposed to. Research now indicates a correlation between the amount of time toddlers spend on digital devices with poor developmental scores later on. That’s not to say one definitely causes the other, but rather that an association between the two has been found.

Doctors recommend that parents limit children’s use of technology to one hour per day. They also recommend that outside activity and exercise replace couch slouching and staring at the TV. Additionally, a recommended eight hours of sleep is prescribed. Many children use a handheld device to lull themselves to sleep like a teddy bear, but screens have the opposite effect. They stimulate kids and cause them to stay up later than they should.

All parents should take this new information seriously and put limits on technology use by young children.

Answer with Explanation;

Claim: Parents should limit the amount of screen time their children are exposed to

Reasons: because the amount of time toddlers spend on digital devices is correlated to their poor developmental scores later on and it causes them to stay up later than they should.

Evidence: An association between the amount of time toddlers spend on digital devices and their poor developmental scores later in life has been found. Screens have the opposite effect to that of the teddy bear which lulls them to sleep.

The author used the logical fallacy of "appeal to authority" by stating that "doctor's recommend that parents limit children's use of technology to one hour per day" and "recommending eight hours of sleep." The writer used this device in order to persuade people because the "doctor" is someone who is in authority of such subject.

the legal limit for the drivers who can drive after consuming any amount of alcohol is 21 years.

explanation:

on november 1, 1996, a "zero tolerance law" was put into effect in the new york state.

according to this zero tolerance law, for people under the age of 21 years, it was illegal to purchase and possess alcohol or to drive after consuming any amount of it.

also, the alcohol involvement rate for the drivers under the age of 21 was roughly twice that of elderly drivers.