is expressing ideas from a source in your own words. Unlike paraphrase, it removes much of the detail from the original passage. The goal is to abbreviate and reword the original text, allowing writers to place otherwise lengthy sources directly into their own arguments to support a claim of their own, to illustrate a point from an opposing position, or to help explain the topic itself.

The answer is Summary

Explanation:

Summary removes much detail from a source, it is a short restatement of main points. A summary is flexible because it provides a brief overview of the text.

A book can be summarized in a sentence or paragraph for better understanding for the readers. in summary, it is advisable not to change the main point of the text or the meaning.

Summary is used to shorten a material, by drawing out the points that is related to what you are working on. Summary is also used to simplify the material by picking out the most important arguments, vocabularies, sentences in the source text.

Furthermore, by summarizing, extra information are omitted from the source material in order to focus on the main points of the text.

B

Explanation:

I would go with B. Express the main ideas in your own words.

Paraphrasing is not about just changing the words around, or just taking a few out, you have to re-write it in your own words, and shorter. Almost like a summary.  

idk

explanation:

based on the biblical principle proverbs 16: 32, i agree with the author of the passage "better is it that it takes longer to be angry than the strong " to the extent that i share the philosophy that the nobility of heart demonstrates the strength of a person. those who are very proud, get angry easily and show their anger toward others are really weak, but those who are noble and do not constantly obfuscate or contain their feelings of anger, are strong people