To Kill A mockingbird chapter 3

In the tiff between Scout and Calpurnia, Atticus takes Calpurnia’s side. What does this show us?

1. read the following excerpt from franklin d. roosevelt's "fireside chat 19":

on the other side of the picture, we must learn also to know that guerilla warfare against the germans in, let us say serbia or norway, us; that a successful russian offensive against the germans us; and that british successes on land or sea in any part of the world strengthen our hands.

remember always that germany and italy, regardless of any formal declaration of war, consider themselves at war with the united states at this moment just as much as they consider themselves at war with britain or russia. and germany puts all the other republics of the americas into the same category of enemies. the people of our sister republics of this hemisphere can be honored by that fact.  

the true goal we seek is far above and beyond the ugly field of battle. when we resort to force, as now we must, we are determined that this force shall be directed toward ultimate good as well as against immediate evil. we americans are not destroyers — we are builders.

analyze the effectiveness of this excerpt. how does it function within the speech as a whole? how does the structure of the excerpt to convey the speech's purpose and key points? support your argument with evidence from the speech. (10 points)

this is ! \

hope this

what's the text? where is the map? you can attach photos if you need to, by the way. no way to answer the question without the text and the map stated.

here is what i have found for you online. that is the analysis of 14 chapter. jim’s realist interpretation of the night’s events convinces huck that avoiding dangers in the future is reasonable. this is a maturation in terms of his pragmatism, but also in his regard for jim, whose intelligence he prejudicially dismissed before.   in addition to foreshadowing huck and jim’s adventures with the duke and king, this passage provides jim’s critique of wealth as expressed in his critique of solomon: he thinks that people with little cherish what they have all the more, whereas those with surplus devalue what they have. in addition, jim here criticizes a biblical hero as being a fool on the grounds that he is not caring enough, and while jim may be missing the point he is also not entirely wrong, either. the rest can be done by the experts i know. check   prime writings for more details.